AI made coding cheap. Clear business logic is still expensive.
RuleFoundry interviews the people who know the workflow, asks the follow-up questions most teams miss, and turns messy explanation into live diagrams, reviewable rules, flows, pseudo-code, scenarios, and open questions engineering can build from.
Free plan includes 5 lifetime live extractions. Work email required in product.
- Conversation is where the real rules start to surface
- Live diagrams, rules, and open questions take shape while the expert is still in context
- Teams review the logic before implementation starts
Anything under five hundred we just push through automatically.
Is that threshold the same across all regions and account types?
No. In Germany, anything over twenty percent discount goes to regional finance.
Strategic accounts above two-fifty need VP Sales sign-off.
And if the account already has a finance review flag?
Then finance gets it first, regardless of amount.
| Condition | Route | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Finance review flag = true | Finance review | 14:36 |
| Region = DE and discount > 20% | Regional finance | 14:33 |
| Strategic account and ARR > $250k | VP Sales | 14:35 |
| Discount > 10% | Sales manager | Inferred |
The real spec is usually still in someone's head
Business logic tends to degrade across meetings, notes, screenshots, and handoffs. Implementation got cheaper faster than extraction did, so more teams can build from incomplete logic before the real rules are fully clarified.
The rules are not in the ticket
The real logic usually lives across a few experts, old spreadsheets, and repeated clarification calls.
The expert can explain it, but not document it
Most experts will talk through the work clearly when asked the right questions. They will not write an implementation-grade spec from scratch.
Coding got cheaper. Extraction did not.
Implementation is getting easier to produce. Pulling correct thresholds, exceptions, and approval paths out of experts is still manual, uneven, and hard to scale.
See what RuleFoundry actually pulls out of a conversation
This example shows the kind of workflow where hidden rules and exceptions create rework fast.
What the expert says
Non-standard pricing approval routing
- 'Anything over twenty percent in Germany goes to regional finance.'
- 'If the account already has a finance review flag, it always goes there first.'
- 'Strategic accounts above two-fifty need VP Sales sign-off.'
What RuleFoundry extracts
| Condition | Route |
|---|---|
| Finance review flag = true | Route to finance review |
| Region = DE and discount > 20% | Route to regional finance |
| Strategic account and ARR > $250k | Route to VP Sales |
| Discount > 10% | Route to sales manager |
| Otherwise | Auto-approve |
Every rule links back to source statements so reviewers can see what was extracted versus what still needs confirmation.
What still needs confirmation
- Do renewals follow the same thresholds?
- Do partner-led accounts need operations review?
- Can regional finance delegate back to sales management?
Scope the workflow. Run the interview. Review before build.
The workflow stays simple. RuleFoundry does the extraction work of probing for missing conditions, structuring logic, and packaging it for review.
Scope the workflow
Describe the workflow, why it matters, who knows it best, and what the output will be used for. Even one sentence is enough to start.
Run the interview
RuleFoundry joins the conversation, asks targeted follow-up questions, and surfaces the rules and exceptions that would otherwise stay implicit.
Review and pressure-test
Teams inspect the outputs as rules, flow, pseudo-code, scenarios, and open questions before implementation starts.
Reviewable. Traceable. Safe to use on real workflows.
Built for real workflows: traceable outputs, controlled handling, and review before build.
Source-linked outputs
Rules should not appear out of nowhere. Teams need to see where the logic came from.
Human review before build
RuleFoundry is designed to make the logic explicit so the right people can confirm it before engineering starts.
Private workspace
Built for real operational workflows with traceable outputs and controlled handling.
Built for serious workflows
Made for logic-heavy work where missing one exception can break the handoff downstream.
Bring us one ugly workflow
Start with something people always ask one person to explain. Try it free, see what RuleFoundry pulls out of it, then move into real sessions and paid usage if it proves useful.